Bundy's fight is the latest skirmish in a long conflict between ranchers and the federal government. Bundy lost many allies when he started marking remarks about slavery, but there's a deeper story here. Bundy is the Nevada rancher who stopped the Bureau of Land Management from removing his cattle from federal land. In the past three weeks, a man named Cliven Bundy went from anonymity to national fame to notoriety. I'm Renee Montagne.Īnd I'm Steve Inskeep. Joshua appeared for a Part 20 Defendant in this case concerning restitutionary remedies when personal property had been inadvertently given away.This is MORNING EDITION from NPR News. It involved a consideration of this phrase in successive rent acts dating back to 1915.
The main issue was whether mixed premises such as this fell within the definition of âlet as a dwellingâ in the Rent Act 1977. Tan and another v Sitkowski : Joshua appeared for the respondent landlord, and was applauded for presenting his submissions in this difficult appeal in a concise and clear way by NEUBERGER LJ in a case that involved recovery of possession of shop premises with accommodation above let for a business use but which the tenant had turned into his home without the express consent of the landlord.He regularly appears in Courts at all levels. He has extensive experience of boundary disputes and litigation arising out of conveyancing transactions. Joshuaâs practice includes all aspects of property and landlord and tenant law. A case concerning the recoverability of costs by an applicant in judicial review proceedings where it became unnecessary to pursue the substantive application. R (on the application of Kuzeva) v London Borough of Southwark AER(D) 488 (May).In addition to establishing principles regarding the award of damages, the local authority succeeded on the facts. In this case Joshua Swirsky acted for the local authority defending a claim that it had failed to have regard to the right to family life of an asylum seeker with health problems when it housed her in premises which she and her advisors regarded as unsuitable because of her disabilities. This is the leading case on the recoverability of damages for breaches of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Anufrijeva v London Borough of Southwark â QB1124.R (on the application of Burns) v London Borough of Southwark AER (D) 328 (Jul) Joshua Swirsky was instructed by the local authority in this judicial review concerning the degree to which a homelessness officer employed by a local authority and dealing with a homeless person was entitled to rely upon what he was told by the Home Office regarding that personâs immigration status.Where a delay causes no prejudice, that can be taken into account but the longer any delay lasts, the greater the risk that the ratepayer will be able to show prejudice. the proper course is to ask, first, whether substantial compliance with the regulation has occurred and, secondly, whether the ratepayer has been prejudiced by any particular delay that could qualify as a breach of the regulation. Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court: When considering whether a billing authority has satisfied the requirements of reg 5(1) of the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989. R (on the application of the Waltham Forest London Borough Council) v Waltham Forest Magistrates’ Court – 1 EGLR 113: Joshua Swirsky was instructed by the authority in a case which involved Recovery of rates.The latter includes business rates, homelessness and compulsory purchase. The former includes all aspects of the provision of services, Care Act 2014 (including the recovery of fees) age assessments (including the admissibility of dental and medical evidence) and Court of Protection proceedings, in cases involving both welfare and property/affairs.
Joshua undertakes judicial reviews and other proceedings in the field of adult social care and arising out of property related issues.